Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Tom's avatar

I remember back in year eight smashing through the BELGARIAD at a clip, and mostly enjoying aspects like Silk the thief, with his ridiculously articulate Drasnian sign language (same thing is more or less found in DUNE).

The MALLOREON was just finishing its publication round that point. Think I had to wait for the local public library to pick up the last book in the series. By the time this second "pentalogy" had finished, I was already conscious of the fundamentally conservative, risk averse approach of the novels. I knew that my darlings would all be safe, and Eddings showed himself (or they showed themselves) to be reluctant to contemplate tragedy—tragedy was for other people, not these characters.

The contrived apotheosis of Durnik might be seen as the point where an Eddings-fantasy departs from Tolkien. Where Tolkien the philologist was steeped in myth and saga, the consolatory philosophy of mortality and of the virtue of a good life (and therefore death) to a truly hackneyed extent, the Eddings flatly refuse any outcome so unpleasant as death. Their characters not only don't die during the story—we are reassured that none of them will ever die. If the Eddings had written THE LORD OF THE RINGS, Aragorn would have become immortal at the end.

The "play happily with my dolls" psychology of this kind of fantasy perhaps has some bearing on the abuse the couple inflicted on children …

Expand full comment
Gabriele Alfredo Pini's avatar

I was shocked to discover about the whole affair today, and I thank you for your insights.

I'm still elaborating it all.

Expand full comment
8 more comments...

No posts